Newsletter

27 Comments
15 August 2008
NEWSLETTER: Key Notes No.36

GOING FOR GROWTH

Quality infrastructure is vital for lifting our productivity, improving public services, and generating long-term economic growth. A critical component of that infrastructure is our electricity sector and, in particular, our electricity supply.

Yesterday, in a speech to the Council for Infrastructure Development, I outlined our energy policy. There are four key things National will do to ensure New Zealanders can have confidence in our electricity supply. These include:

– Acknowledging the extent of future demand. National will be realistic about the likely need for more electricity supply to keep New Zealand growing in the years ahead.

– Reforming the Resource Management Act (RMA) and introducing Priority Consenting to allow more generation and transmission to be built. National will introduce to Parliament a bill to reform the RMA within the first 100 days of its first term. The legislation will include removing the ministerial veto over consents, reducing the number of consent categories, and putting an end to frivolous and vexatious objections.

– Sending a clear signal that gas will be a part of the energy mix needed for security of supply. New Zealand has fantastic renewable resources like hydro and wind, and it's important that we develop those. We support the 90% renewables target. However, we accept that sometimes thermal electricity generation is needed for keeping the lights on, as we have seen this winter. National will therefore overturn the Government's ban on new base-load thermal power stations. 

– Streamlining the investment and decision-making processes for investing in new transmission. National will undertake a careful review of the roles played by the Electricity Commission, Commerce Commission, and Transpower. We will do this with a particular focus on reducing duplication and costly bureaucracy, and ensuring the best outcomes for consumers – in terms of security of supply and affordability. 

In addition to security of electricity supply, we need to balance our energy needs with our environmental responsibilities.

National is determined to provide clear policy settings that favour renewable electricity generation. We will have an emissions trading scheme (ETS) on the statute books within nine months of taking office. We expect this ETS will result in no new coal stations being built – unless proven technologies for carbon capture and storage change the emissions profile of coal.

You can read the full policy document here.

AN UNRELENTING FOCUS ON WORK

On Monday, I launched National's benefits policy.

National is committed to a benefit system that is a genuine safety net in times of need. We recognise that many people on a benefit will never be able to work because of illness or disability. But we also believe that returning to paid work is the route to independence and well-being for most people, and is the best way to reduce child poverty. Long-term welfare dependency locks people into a life of limited income and limited choices. That's why National has an unrelenting focus on work.

We will require everyone who has been on the dole for more than a year to re-apply for their benefit and undergo a comprehensive work assessment. All long-term unemployment beneficiaries should be doing whatever it takes to get a job. This may include practical training, attending a basic skills course, or being in drug and alcohol rehabilitation. 

We will introduce part-time work obligations to two groups of beneficiaries – DPB recipients, once their youngest dependent child is aged six or over, and people on sickness and invalid benefits who have been assessed as being able to work part-time. About 5,600 sickness and invalid beneficiaries have been categorised as capable of working right now. These beneficiaries will be required to spend at least 15 hours per week in employment, training, or job-seeking activities.

We will introduce a more graduated system of sanctions for people who do not comply with their work obligations. This will give Work and Income case managers more flexibility to encourage beneficiaries into work.

We also want appropriate incentives in the benefit system so that those on benefits actually want to work. Benefit abatement is a necessary part of the system, but the high marginal tax rates it creates are a disincentive for people to work even a few hours a week. So, National will raise the earnings threshold and allow beneficiaries to earn up to $100 a week before their benefit begins to be abated.

We will also:

– Introduce more frequent reassessment during the first few months a person is on a sickness benefit. Anyone on a sickness benefit continuously for 12 months will automatically be sent to a 'designated doctor' for a second opinion on their work prospects.

– Enshrine in legislation CPI adjustments to welfare benefits so they rise each year in line with inflation.

– Reject Labour's planned new benefit terminology. Labour's pursuit of a 'single core benefit' has been a complete farce.

– Require the most frequent applicants for benefit advances to attend a budget advisory service at the Government's expense to get qualified, experienced, non-judgmental budgeting advice to help them manage their finances. Those not attending will not be eligible for any further benefit advances.

National will announce our policies on other aspects of the welfare system soon, including vulnerable children and families, child support, and the community and voluntary sector.

DOWN SOUTH

It was great to spend some time in Dunedin on Wednesday meeting with locals and getting a feel for the issues people are concerned about. I chatted with residents of the Brooklands Retirement Village in Mosgiel, received a briefing on the proposed new stadium, spoke to the Otago Chamber of Commerce, and even spent some time at a hairdresser booking customers in for appointments!

It was also my pleasure – along with National MPs Katherine Rich, Jacqui Dean, and Eric Roy – to attend the campaign launch of our Dunedin candidates Conway Powell and Michael Woodhouse. National faces a big challenge in the city, and Michael and Conway are leading the charge.

Dunedin has been hit pretty hard by recent factory closures and the downturn, and the rising cost of living is at the forefront of most people's minds. Throughout the day I spoke about our five-point plan for the economy – an ongoing programme of tax cuts, disciplined government spending, cutting bureaucracy and red tape, higher education standards, and boosting infrastructure investment – and this got a warm reception. I'll be announcing more details on our economic policies in the run-up to the election.

John Key MP
Leader of the National Party


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - Conway Powell 2008-08-15 17:40 - (Reply)

Great to have John Key in Dunedin for the formal launch of the election campaigns for Michael Woodhouse (Dunedin North) and me. So many people wanted to stop and talk, have the photos taken and meet up with John. An excellent day - Conway Powell (Dunedin South candidate)

#2 - Don Barr 2008-08-15 17:53 - (Reply)

Ok, re sickness beneficiaries. Good, but I do not trust a 'designated' Doctor to give a fair opinion, been there, got screwed and no t-shirt. The trap of more frequent visits to the Doctor is the cost. On the married sickness benefit, I get $153 per week, and my partner gets $153 per week. It is very hard to live on that, especially when I have to pay as much as $45 for a Doctors visit, plus part charges for medicine, and being diabetic, food costs are much higher than non diabetics, tablets to replace the use of sugar in drinks are much more costly than sugar is. By the way I am working 17.5 hours a week, hoping to maybe be cleared to work full time next year. Now what would make you look good is if Winz had to pay the total cost for the doctors visits for assesment. Another move that I think would get you votes is to make the sugar makers/importers subsidise the cost of sugar replacements for diabetics, such as Equal. They are much more costly than sugar is, but hey they do not make and sell as much, so it is a volume thing. However it is sugar consumption that is making most diabetics, so bill it to the source of the problem. Now my thoughts on power. Think about this, there are people here who generate their own power, either wind or solar. However they are not allowed to sell it back into the grid when they are making more than they use. Also encouraging people to self supply power will help reduce the loads too. Living in a cold area, the big push to get clean air by getting rid of wood burners and changing to heat pumps, is just bad policy. In the south in rural areas having a wood burner is the difference between life and death for most people when the damn power goes out, which it does far far more frequently than in cities, and it is usually out for the longest periods when it is the coldest. An example of this is Ophir in Central Otago, where it has been known to be colder than at Scott Base!! I lived not far from there for seven years, during winter possums took the power out at least monthly, and each time to a huge area, many farms and small rural communities. We have had -20 at where we were when snowed in, thank god for our Yunca fire place. We could even boil water and make soup on it during power outages. I have lots of answers, but no power to do anything. Don

#2.1 - Angela 2008-08-16 09:22 - (Reply)

seriously Don - why should anyone but a diabetic pay for sugar replacement ? Where do we draw the line - lactose intolerance, gluten intolerance.... If I can't drink wine due to acid reflux problems should the winemakers pay for me to have an acid free substitute ? I don't think so ! we all have health issues and the mainstream would not expect our individual idiosyncrasies to be funded by anyone. if you can't afford a sugar replacement in your hot drinks, perhaps you should get used to having a hot drink without sweetener ? I don't think it would kill you to make a small sacrifice to save as much money as you say it is costing you... Honestly if you were aware of the carcinogens and poisons contained in the sweeteners you would give them up in a heatbeat.

#2.1.1 - Don 2008-08-16 17:23 - (Reply)

Well angela not all sweetners have carcinogens and poisons in them, and they are not used just for hot drinks, they are used in cooking as well. Also connected with the issue is that the numbers of diabetics are increasing far more than they should be. I can see the day rapidly approaching where sugar will be treated like tobacco. Which, as it is so bad, should just be banned all together. I am also sorry, memory is what the head injury damaged, I forgot to put in the subsidy was for people on a benefit. It those of us whose income is held well below the minimum wage income that struggle. Of course with luck those of us who are sick will all die before we become too much of a burden for those of you blessed with good health.

#3 - Tom T Wilson 2008-08-15 18:38 - (Reply)

"We also want appropriate incentives in the benefit system so that those on benefits actually want to work. Benefit abatement is a necessary part of the system, but the high marginal tax rates it creates are a disincentive for people to work even a few hours a week. So, National will raise the earnings threshold and allow beneficiaries to earn up to $100 a week before their benefit begins to be abated." So howz this going to affect the worker who has got themselves a TRADE, Works in excess of 55-60hrs a week? Has to pay the top tax bracket?? Yep I earn a comfortable liveing, but we have to pay for evrything!!!! no free doctor, no free courses.... why not???oh yeah I work....... how stupid of me.... maybe I should just quit and have an easier life on a benifit. By the way I have been there!!! ex Tomaona Engineer!

#4 - John Chant 2008-08-15 19:24 - (Reply)

With reference to the security of power supplies I am pleased to see that the blinkered views of the narrow focussed Greens will not influence National policies. However, whilst wind farms should be encouraged in suitable non-scenic areas they do not constitute any sort of solution to mainstream power generation. Thermal generation should remain an option as we must put NZ needs ahead of any high-flown and theoretical carbon footprint considerations. Let's not forget that the amount of carbon in the atmosphere is of the order of 1/2% worldwide. NZ produces about the same figure of global pollution. Infinitessimal by any standards. We should keep a weather eye on the British experiment in tidal power as this has the potential to be a significant player in the clean and consistent generation of power for the future. NZ has a plethora of suitable tidal inlets to site underwater generators that would offend no-one aesthetically.

#5 - Fraser Walls 2008-08-15 20:44 - (Reply)

Gas for peak load electricity generation if essential, but not for base load. The money would be better spent on solar water heaters thus leaving more water behind the dams year after year to be used for base load. This continues to multiply the return on investment.

#6 - Kevin said:
2008-08-15 21:11 - (Reply)

A good start to solving this problem. But how about "enshrining in legislation" that tax brackets will be linked to the CPI?? Get rid of the gross injustice of tax creep forever! And - spread your income over your dependents - that will reduce pressure on jobs and be fair to parents who choose to stay at home and bring up responsible kids - instead of the stinking system we've had for the last 25 years!

#7 - steve 2008-08-16 09:15 - (Reply)

Great. Just waiting for the underage contraception policy and education on its use in schools policy announcement, to give real teeth to reducing unwanted pregnancies, solo parentage and the like. And please ignore all religious influence that is a barrier to this logical extension. Glad to see that we can still grow our way out of most of our problems. I need that reassurance in these dark times when the earths finiteness seems to be crashing in from all directions.

#8 - Angela 2008-08-16 09:32 - (Reply)

I am all for providing assistance to solo Mums and Dads who are struggling, and appreciate the proposed changes by National to reduce the cost to the country with the new plan. However - get a full DBP until the child turns 6 ? what working couples can afford for a parent to stay home until the child is 6 ? Not many that I know. What is wrong with "when the child turns 5" i.e. when it goes to school, or even earlier with childcare assistance on a part time basis. A good time to get a job I think. We are having our first child next year, and as a self employed business owner, I will effectively be returning to work almost immediately in some capacity, how dearly I would love to be paid to be a stay at home Mum for 6 years. Its a nice dream that won't be fulfilled because we are proudly financially independent from the state. With regards to CPI adjusted benefits - agree with previous poster, the day that salaries, wages and tax brackets are CPI adjusted would be the fair and equitable time to CPI adjust benefits. Go National Go !

#9 - Harvey 2008-08-16 10:30 - (Reply)

RMA reform ... great and much needed. But don't just provide 'priority' for important projects, cut it back for ordinary people doing ordinary things on their houses. As it is now, neighbours can, and do, extort payments before giving their agreement. This is introducing a very unwelcom corruption to NZ.

#10 - Kevin said:
2008-08-16 12:59 - (Reply)

Yes, the system is totally unfair to struggling working couples. One injustice is that the full cost of subsidised rent and other "benefits given in kind" ($3-4 billion per annum) should be declared as part of the beneficiry's income. Lets see Benefit + HNZC house + top ups for $3000 sofas and pet's vet bills + free training + free uni for their kids + ... list goers on! vs Wages + high house prices* + pay for your own sofa + pay your own training fees + kids take out a loan for university High house prices because rental businesses are a protected, subsidied investment. Will National deal with these fundamental problems that our driving our best people off shore?

#10.1 - Don 2008-08-16 14:17 - (Reply)

I have several times been on a benifit between jobs, and I am well skilled employee. Currently I am working my way off a sickness benefit. A situation caused by a head injury that was not treated correctly at Middlemore Hospital. Had I been scanned they would have found it before major damage was done. But anyway I have never been living in a state house. WINZ has never paid for a sofa, vet bills top ups, training or Uni. In fact they won't give me more than the minimum benefit. However I own a house, I own vehicles, I have pets. My furnature is not tatty, nor exspensive. I pay my credit card bills, I pay my mortgage. I eat reasonably well. Mind you I do work currently 17.5 hours a week. I do not drink much, and what I do drink I make myself. I do not do drugs, (too exspensive). I am good with money though. I think what those on a benefit need the most is good budget advice, and teaching of how to live frugally. Some would also be helped by English lessons. Oh yeah, god how I hate txt writing anywhere other than on a cell phone!

#10.1.1 - Kevin said:
2008-08-16 17:31 - (Reply)

Well being one of the honest ones you must get really mad that many beneficiaries are getting the all the extras as I outlined because it is happening and has happened for decades.

#11 - Brian Metcalf said:
2008-08-16 16:41 - (Reply)

National will therefore overturn the Government's ban on new base-load thermal power stations. I have just returned from a month each in France & UK. France has 80% energy produced by nuclear fission in compact, state of the art plants. I quizzed around 40 French men & women I met about nuclear power. No one was worried. In fact they were proud of their nuclear programme and not concerned ied about the dangers. As one of them said: "This is not Chernobyl. Our technology is way ahead of the Russkis". There have been no serious safety events and NO POWER SHORTAGES for the last 20 years. By contrast the UK Generators are planning several new coal/oil fired stations and environmentalists are out in force marching and protesting e.g. last week end. Nobody wants any more polluting coal power plants. Nuclear is the ONLY proven CO2 free technology available at the moment. We could manage with 2 medium sized nuclear plants operating, one in each island. Wind, solar and hydroelectric would provide back up and ease load on nuclear at high winter usage times. John - PLEASE DON'T BE NERVOUS OF LISTING NUCLEAR POWER !! Even the Aussies are discussing it freely. NZ is the last bastion of anti nuclearism (based on Anti Americanism). Heh we have to grow up. The threat of greenhouse climate change is FAR more serious than problems of disposing of nuclear waste.

#12 - Tama Nikora 2008-08-16 23:53 - (Reply)

Don't know what to do with money these days. Yes, Fund infrastructure development by Govt Bonds ASAP. Heaps of opportunities in tidal power development. I have worked and saved all my life to be able to look after myself but at my age of 76 years but I am still taxed on my savings. I do not need the miserable old aged pension. Knock out the beneficiary leaches. The DPB's are nonsense. I come from a generation which worked for my living, and am appalled by the attitude of dependency generated by Labour, to assist drones. Bring back the right to contract employment. People should be advised to take out health insurance as means to require them to be responsible for their own health, brush their teeth, have a wash and have choice to eat what they like. If they kill themselves, that is their problem. Encourage privatisation of hospitals because it is already happening. Cost me $20,000 at a private hospital for my prostate. The hospitals are now bigger than the Kawerau Mill and cost the moon to run. ACC has played out. I went to see a doctor about a scratch on my leg. I told the doctor I had fell over at home and scratched my leg and wanted it bandaged. When I left, I was told there was no charge because ACC will pay, I was overjoyed. However, when I went back with another scratch I was told I had to pay because it was not an accident and that I was of an age where healing was difficult. I am philosophical and accept that all life is terminal. Do not legalise prostitution. What people do in the middle of the night is their business and cannot be controlled. President Clinton was not guilty; that was just nature at work. It was that stupid dame that caused the problems. There was also that case in Auckland about the rapist where the Court advised him to take more time for romantic overtures. About the smacking Bill - The Prime Minister of Australia quite lovingly touched the Queens bum, she did not mind but everyone else complained. The RMA is a general curse. We have an RMA consent to develop forested land. The terrorists however have shown up to extort money out of us, or else they will set fire to the forest. The trespass act and the police are of no help and we just had to pay them off. There are too many people in jail. One was a father who committed incest many many years ago but grew up to become highly religious and is now of an age incapable of sex anymore and to be a respectable citizen. Putting him in jail at our cost does nothing. Get them to work for the salvation army. There are many people who have been incarcerated for crimes of no deliberate or planned intent and who are not a threat to the community. Taito Phillips should not be jailed; Govt itself is far more guilty. Farmers should have right to defend their properties. I should have right to defend my property against burglars. Teams of children raided my place and stripped my house. I suffered for weeks but eventually the police recovered my computer. I lost the rest. My house today is a fortress of alarms and lights. The police should have right to do what they must without hassle or prosecution, because crime is a state of no law at all. They should bear arms and not pretend anymore. The official language should be english. My friend Tame iti is insisting on costly translation services in the Court. He watches television every night. This does not stop Maori from speaking Maori. Moreover there are 150 different nationalities in NZ where a tower of babel is unthinkable. Fix up the Ture Whenua by fiscal policy to prioritise property management. Tell you how later. Will save millions and be more helpful for Maori. Knock out Governments undemocratic mandate process and insist upon proper constitutions accountability and elections before negotiations. cf Mugabe, Iran etc. Adopt fiduciary duty to ensure accountability to shareholders and beneficiaries. I can think of nothing worse than a huge amount of money from day one. Should be 1O year annual settlements to give Maori chance to marry in their management and to plan their investments over time. Leave the Courts to do their job and maintain the pathway to justice. Do not deny justice. Only uncivilised nations do. There should be right to make claims for some years yet. Don’t need apologies or final settlements. Govt can just say yes or no as what any rangatira will do. Let Maori have their day in Court. The Crown does have ample opportunity and experts to defend itself. Wait for the Tribunal reports before negotiations. Current Govt effort, to negotiate before receipt of those reports is just an abuse of process for advantage of the Crown and for political purposes. Those reports were achieved at our massive cost. Stop or repeal the secret CNI Forests Collective Settlement Bill because it denies justice. CFRT has failed in its job and is being used by Cullen as his piggy bank. Demand more transparent accounting from CFRT. Require the Tribunal not to register claims without some prior assessment of some element of the validity of those claims. One thing is very clear, Govt cannot run the corner dairy, and the economy is in a real mess. A view of recession and depression is driving our people to Australia and foreigners taking over this country. Prince William should be the next king and not Charles. Helen Clark and the Speaker should not take the salute. That is the job of the Governor General who is the final bastion for the passage of law and who should have duty to appoint the Judges. The intervention of Government in this area is unacceptable. God should not be asked to defend NZ because he already knows we can help ourselves without all these prescriptive laws. God bless Aotearoa Mr Key, I entirely and absolutely support what I know of your policies and have faith that you can improve the economy. ------------------

#13 - John Chant 2008-08-17 08:26 - (Reply)

Let's avoid nuclear energy if it at all practicable. If we find that we cannot supply sufficient energy by conventional means then by all means look at the nuclear option. However, if the scientists can stop navel gazing on inconsequential issues and make a real attempt to make FUSION rather than FISSION a reality then we shall all safely benefit. John Chant.

#13.1 - Mrs Sandra Barden 2008-08-17 11:21 - (Reply)

Keep up your great leadership role, your visions for a country to go forward have a practical level of common sense, please do not foget the children of our nation who do not a fair chance due to circumstances beyond their control, they being our future. Please, can you advise us to whom should we vote for as we are in Ms Helen Clarke's electoral area, she does not represent us in any way or form, so what is the best angle for us to help the National Party from our are of Point Chevalier, so we can obtain the best advantage in this day and in age of MMP Thank you Sandra Barden (Mrs)

#13.1.1 - Kevin said:
2008-08-17 15:27 - (Reply)

the most important vote is giving the party vote to National. Don't let anyone convince you of any thing different. Any party vote for a minor party that doesnt get over the 5% threshold is a totally wasted vote. Ravi Musuku is the National candidate for Mt Albert - I stronly suggest voting for him. National Party’s Candidate for Mt Albert RSVP 625 5994 Email: ravi.musuku@national.org.nz

#14 - John Chant 2008-08-17 12:07 - (Reply)

If we are to remain with proportional representation then we must shift off MMP and move to a system like STV (single transferable vote). This will remove the situation where the self-serving parties can put their own lick-spittle, voting-fodder, back-bench drones onto the list. With STV we the electorate would vote for the list giving the power of choice back to the people. Hopefully, however, National might just clear the 50% hurdle and give the fingers to the other narrow focussed parties. FPP again? John Chant.

#14.1 - Nathan McCluskey 2008-08-18 09:31 - (Reply)

You're dreaming, buddy. If my memory serves, this hasn't happened in NZ in over half a century (most of which was under FPP), so it's certainly not going to happen under MMP. If National are smart, they'll start looking for realistic coalition partners now or they will find themselves with more seats than any other party, but still in opposition to yet another minority Labour-led coalition.

#15 - John Chant 2008-08-18 14:45 - (Reply)

I think it is yourself that is dreaming Nathan. Whether or not National get 51% will not change the outcome. Should they not cross the 50% line then you watch the parties queue up to join National. Politicians by definition are mostly desperate for power and some will sell their souls to gain it. No minority government like the last shambles methinks. John Chant.

#16 - R J M 2008-08-18 15:49 - (Reply)

All above to me is just the thin veneer of this society which appears to have a great deal of anger just under the surface, if we do not get a very strong leadership soon that anger will explode and will become unmangable. Kiwis in general I think are a fair minded lot but are nearing the ending of their tolerance. It might be Winz,Acc, Education, Health, Justice system, Tax, low productivity etc, they all seem to have got themselves out of whack with base of our poulation. For a nation of a mere 4 miilon people we are really bogged down with systems and theories that are not working. Get some of the non productive work force doing something that actually helps woul be a good start. Our leaders have not learnt that Beucracy increases by 5% per year every year until someone has the strength/courage to stop it. Not really convince National as the where with all to do so. RJM

#17 - Jan Daffern 2008-08-21 23:02 - (Reply)

Good Energy Policy, shame about the ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) Last Week, (Key Notes 35) every submissions made that refered to the ETS scheme agreed the whole scheme is a sham. It is somewhat ironic that, today, even the Greens who want to kill off or tax anything that farts, smells or makes money, can't even decide what to do about a proposed ETS and are now asking the public what they think. Shall I them or do you want the pleasure! Hello? is there anyone out there who can explain within this forum any true and absolute advantages of an ETS? Bearing in mind, of course, that an ETS does not reduce emissions it simply puts a price on them instead. If there is to be a price on anything, then surely that price should be directed towards an Energy Policy that involves even further research and development into efficient and innovative technologies.

#17.1 - Alois Schatzdorfer 2008-08-24 11:18 - (Reply)

I fully agree with Jan, that the ETS is a scam. It will do nothing for the enviroment, but it will cost every citizen of NZ thousands of dollars every year. Most people with half a brain have recognised that ETS is nothing but another Tax and as we can hear from talkback shows people will not vote for any Party implementing ETS

#17.1.1 - Graham Cliff said:
2008-09-11 18:29 - (Reply)

Not only is the ETS a hollow publicity stunt by the Labour government, it is also immoral. As a small-time forester, I'm dismayed that my private property rights have been trampled on: if I wish to fell my trees, I face a huge financial penalty if I don't immediately replant. In other words, I can no longer use the land that I own for purposes that I might otherwise choose. This is tantamount to the state sequestration of freehold land.

#18 - Graham Cliff said:
2008-09-11 18:40 - (Reply)

It's all very well to say that sickness beneficiaries will be more closely monitored in future, by who is going to monitor the WINZ staff who oversee the sytem? I was formerly a 'designated doctor' (specialist) who undertook this work (called IB 11 examination), and I tried to be fair but firm. I learned that some of the claimants whom I'd recommended as being fit for work were subsequently referred for another ('softer')assessment elsewhere, so that the benefit would be continued. WINZ staff often gave the impression that they would much rather have the benefit continued uninterrupted for their clients because it meant a quieter life for themselves. The new arrangements will only be as effective if those charged with implementing it are conscientious enough. I'm not holding my breath.


Add Comment

To prove you're not a spambot, just answer this simple question: Who is the Prime Minister of New Zealand?
 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.