News release

5 Comments
08 October 2009
PM outlines National Govt's plan to fight ‘P'

Prime Minister John Key today outlined the Government's plan to tackle the dangerous drug ‘P' in a speech in Auckland.

"I am determined that we will use the full force of the Government's arsenal to fight the problem of P, a seriously addictive drug that is ruining lives," Mr Key says.

"My officials have been working for months with various government agencies on fighting this menace.  The result is a Government Action Plan on Methamphetamine, which contains a comprehensive set of policy changes."

"The Government is adopting a multi-pronged approach to fighting this dangerous scourge by cracking down on precursors, breaking the supply chain, providing better routes into treatment, supporting families and community, and strengthening leadership and accountability."

The Government moves include:

  • Restricting access to the precursor chemicals P is produced from by making pseudoephedrine a Class B2 controlled drug, making it prescription-only. 
  • Using the proceeds of crime legislation to fund anti-P initiatives, including additional Police and Customs activities to fight gangs and organised crime.  Proceeds will also fund an expansion of drug treatment services.
  • Developing a dedicated treatment pathway for P users, starting with the Ministry of Health investing in additional $22 million in clinical services to ensure both short term and longer-term treatment for P addiction is available to more than 3,000 additional patients over the next three years.
  • Assigning 40 additional Customs officers to special dedicated drug-taskforce duties to help break the supply chain. 
  • Implementing a new Police Methamphetamine Control Strategy from November this year, which aims to use intelligence in new ways to target gangs, investigate drug syndicates which import P precursors illegally, target P ‘cooks' and seize funds and assets gained through P-related activity.
  • Reviewing the outdated Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Act 1966, to provide a more effective legal means for families and doctors to get P-addicts into compulsory assessment and treatment.
  • Making chief executives of Government agencies accountable for delivering on our plans, as measured against a range of targets that will be clearly set out in the actual Action Plan to be released next week.

"The steps outlined today are critical, but if further action is warranted, the Government will take it.  I am not going to pretend that this Action Plan will stamp the P problem out for good," says Mr Key.

"Throughout the world, wherever leaders have promised to eradicate drug use they have found it to be an elusive goal.

"That is why the Government intends to come at the problem from all directions - by cracking down on precursors, breaking the supply chains, providing better routes to treatment, supporting families, and strengthening leadership and accountability."

Related documents:

  • Pseudoephedrine report (pdf, 260 Kb)
  • Tackling P (PDF, 100 Kb)

  • Trackbacks

    No Trackbacks

    Comments
    Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

    #1 - Harry Cording 2009-10-09 14:05 - (Reply)

    More pointless anti-drug posturing from a government that has totally failed to achieve anything positive in the field of drug policy. The most harmful drug - alcohol - continues to receive privileged treatment, while drug laws and proceeds of crime laws are used to deprive citizens of their rights and property. "Throughout the world, wherever leaders have promised to eradicate drug use they have found it to be an elusive goal." It is not merely elusive - it is completely unrealistic, counterproductive and a violation of basic human rights. If you want to solve so-called drug problems, start by legalsing cannabis.

    #2 - David Fowlds 2009-10-10 08:44 - (Reply)

    I am fully suportive of the measures taken by Key`s government ,particularly that related to P. Seeing John Key`s busy schedule I have to be concerned about burn out. I do believe something must be done on tax reform, where we are out of line with other countries to our disadvantage, to favour more productive investment. Firm measures must be followed through . David

    #3 - chris john 2009-10-11 21:33 - (Reply)

    A good start on minimising the P problem (i.e. by addressing it), although I'd be concerned in relation to published evidence that reducing access tends to a] increase price (resulting in more crime associated problems) b] result in more deaths due to cutting the substance with (often more dangerous) adulterants c] enhance monopolies by already dangerous organisations (i.e. gangs) (Escohotado, 1999). Secondarily there is also the problem of rehabilitation of end users/addicts (i.e. getting them back productively into society). Many standard rehabilitation programs seem to have an extremely low level of long term success : ( An exception [and also a low cost alternative] to the standard systems was recently discussed at a conference at Otago university is the plant derivative Ibogaine which is useful in that it appears to chemically block addiction for a period of months and can lead to addicts not going back into the addiction cycle (Glick, 2000, Marsh, 2001; Yu et al 1999). Often it only requires 1 -4 treatment periods of 36 hours to 'cure' the addict, which is significantly cheaper than months of rehab programs. Hopefully a pilot study could be carried out in the $22 million dollar budget for rehab. It could potentially save a large amount of taxpayers money [which is something that the methadone program (being an addictive drug replacing another costly addictive drug for the life of the addict) has totally failed to do, (Escohotado, 1999). (Admin: reference section edited out for length)

    #4 - Geoff Dye 2009-10-12 10:45 - (Reply)

    Congratulations John Key. For once we have the foundations of a holistic approach for combating Meth. However there are a few exposed areas that still need to be addressed. One is the contamination left at the hundreds if not thousands of properties contaminated by the Meth manufacturing process. Of major concern is the lack of requirement for landlords or property managers to disclose if a property has been a meth lab. For those properties that have been identified by the authorities there is a chance that they may have received some form of remediation, however the majority are not officially detected and even proposed remediation requirements are only guidelines. In short for numerous reasons tenants and property owners are very exposed to this new form of toxic building syndrome. Addressing this issue would more fully close the noose on the destruction of the Meth Trade.

    #5 - Peter Bacchus said:
    2009-10-15 22:08 - (Reply)

    The drug question is an ongoing one and one is stamped out or down another one pops up. Part of the issue is having good food which in part has to be knocking back highly processed foods and promoting home gardens and orchards and at the top end promoting biological growing and consumption. Remeber the visit to Agrisea in Paeroa. They are one of many helping to revolutionise growing methods. Part of drug addiction is connected to mineral and vitality deficiency. So long as dietry sufficiency is not full addressed there will be a drug problem. Another part is having something enjoyable and useful to do that brings mana or self worth. So while you are throwing everything at the drug issue I would like the above to be considered. With best wishes, Peter Bacchus, Paeroa 3600


    Add Comment

    To prove you're not a spambot, just answer this simple question: Who is the Prime Minister of New Zealand?
     
    Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.