News release
Newsletter

20 Comments
19 June 2009
Key Notes No.51

Check out and comment on my latest video diary here on YouTube.

Rugby comes to ParliamentALL BLACKS V FRANCE

It was great to see so many school rugby captains – girls and boys – from secondary schools around Wellington at the parliamentary reception for the French team and the All Blacks on Monday.

I think they were almost as excited as I was about meeting the All Black and French Captains (see photo) and so many international rugby players.

Watch and comment on video from the event here.

WARMING UP NEW ZEALAND

I was in Christchurch yesterday to help launch the Government’s home heating and insulation scheme “Warming up New Zealand: Heat Smart”. The scheme will provide grants of up to $1800 for houses built before 2000 that need ceiling and under-floor insulation or a clean-heating device. More than 180,000 homes will have access to these grants regardless of household income.

I’m really proud of this scheme. It will help warm and dry the homes of up to 500,000 New Zealanders, reduce the risks to health that come with cold and damp houses, boost energy efficiency, and grow jobs for people who produce and install insulation and clean heating.

I’m also really pleased that all the main trading banks have agreed to join the scheme. They have waived their fees for top-up loans that homeowners can get as part of insulation retrofits.

Get more information on the scheme here.
Watch the launch of the scheme here.

SECURING QUEEN’S WHARF FOR THE RUGBY WORLD CUP

On Tuesday I announced that the Government and Auckland Regional Council have put up $20 million each to buy Queen’s Wharf in Auckland. Queens Wharf will be a superb cornerstone asset in the development of the Auckland waterfront.

By buying this site we have secured the wharf long after the Rugby World Cup has finished so that it will give pleasure to visitors and locals for generations to come.

The challenge now is to Auckland’s city leaders. They must move swiftly to start an infrastructure programme that transforms the wharf into a world-class waterfront attraction as party central for the Rugby World Cup, and as a high-quality international cruise ship terminal for Auckland and New Zealand.

THE SOUTH ISLAND FORUM

Last week The Press newspaper hosted the Prime Minister’s South Island Forum. This was a great chance to talk about our progress in government.

I summed up at the end of the forum by explaining that governments get elected to concentrate on what actually matters to people.

My perception is that when you go down to the polling booth, you vote on whether the economy is going to be managed properly, whether your communities are safe, whether your kids have got an opportunity, whether we have a health system that really works, and whether you feel like we're actually going in the right direction. And all the other stuff is just white noise that bubbles along.

And what I say to the cabinet and the caucus on a regular basis is – for as long as we stay focused on the issues that matter to New Zealanders, and we come up with solutions, and we're honest with them, we'll enjoy their support.

The simplest, fastest way to get thrown out is to forget why you were put there. We were put there to make New Zealand a better place. That's going to be my intention. And that's what I'm going to deliver.

Watch the first video from the forum here.
Find the rest of the videos from the forum here.

LISTENING TO OUR RURAL COMMUNITIES

I had a great day at Fieldays in Mystery Creek last week catching up with people from across the agricultural industry and talking about the Government’s $190 million investment in the Primary Growth Partnership.

Did I see you there? Check out my photos from the day here.

Best wishes,

John Key
Follow me on Twitter here www.twitter.com/johnkeypm


Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

#1 - J Grants said:
2009-06-19 18:58 - (Reply)

Wow, meeting the All Blacks in person must truly feel special.

#2 - Colin Heald 2009-06-23 11:27 - (Reply)

Please, please, please get rid of Christine Rankin now. It was a mistake to ever appoint her to any position, and she will only bring further embarrassment to the National Government. This comment has nothing to do with her personal life (which is irrelevant) but everything to do with her lack of competence and judgement.

#2.1 - Silver 2009-06-23 12:07 - (Reply)

I agree, I think you got it right with just a few words, she is just bad news, little else to add, except giving her the job in the first place does not display great judgement. Silver

#2.2 - Ross Eion Tought 2009-06-23 12:13 - (Reply)

Christine Rankin is no celebrity in my book and granted, I too think she shouldn't be there..., ..but if there is anyone we need to turn our attention to it would be the little maggots who beat up our guests and entertainers(French Rugby Player). That is a disgrace and national shame! I would prefer we appoint a bullet to some, instead of over crowding prisons or building Monkey Boxes. Regards, Eion Tought

#3 - Kristin Janelle Hoskin CEM 2009-06-23 11:39 - (Reply)

Hi Just wanted to thank you for the Key Notes emails. I don't always have time to read them (although most of the time I do) and I am sure there isn't always much time to write them but I do appreciate getting them. It might be a nice addition to add a bit of what is coming up as well as the what has been happening though. Just a suggestion. Cheers and well done for keeping a smile on your face while doing the most scrutinised job in the country. Cheers Kristin

#4 - Alexander Midwinter 2009-06-23 12:08 - (Reply)

I voted National and am pleased with your performance so far but if you continue with this cavalier attitude with regard to the upcoming referendum and the voiced opinion of the vast majority of New Zealand parents, I for one will not vote for you on principle. It would seem a gross folly to to use a vote to put someone in power who then ignores the voters! I do not think smacking is a first-choice disciplinary measure but there are times when it is appropriate and parents should not have to live in fear of CYFS or the Police invading their lives because on occasion they make the call that 'this is one of those times'.

#4.1 - Andrew 2009-06-24 14:24 - (Reply)

I agree with Alexander's sentiments on the anti-smacking legislation.Parliament is there to listen to the people.I also note John Keys comment on the issue of listening in the Sth Island forum. If the referendum indicates the public want the legislation repealed and the governement does nothing then they will also lose my vote and financial support.

#5 - Carl Chenery 2009-06-23 12:21 - (Reply)

Hi John, Thanks for your note. With regards to concentrating on what matters, I would like to see you integrating 'restoring our natural environment' as a key point in providing in providing a prosperous future for our nation. It came through in the findings of the Growth and Innovation and Advisory Board (http://www.med.govt.nz/templates/MultipageDocumentTOC____40430.aspx?&MSHiC=65001&L=0&W=GIAB+&Pre=%3Cb%3E&Post=%3C%2fb%3E) commissioned by the government, as something that matters to New Zealanders: "A clear majority of New Zealanders rated the following lifestyle and personal factors as most important to them: quality of life, quality of the environment, quality of education and quality of health services." "Respondents rank quality of life and quality of natural environment (together with quality of artistic and cultural heritage) very highly both for personal importance and for New Zealand’s performance in these areas...." What would a national government approach look like that didn't seek to minimise risk (do what we can so we can maintain a perception of a 'clean green nation'), but instead had attention, transparency and leadership on enhancing our environment?

#6 - Paula Wagstaff 2009-06-23 13:16 - (Reply)

On the NZHerald on-line at 10.37 these comments appeared...in relation to Peter Dunne. QUOTE:- Prime Minister John Key stopped short of critising Christine Rankin for her renewed criticism of the anti-smacking law..... BUT he made it clear he will NOT TOLERATE ANY active campaigning by the families commissioner before the referendum Does that mean he will NOT TOLERATE ANY campaigning from ANY families commissioner....or just Christine

#6.1 - Anonymous 2009-06-23 18:00 - (Reply)

Good question Paula.I personally thought it was a little incautious appointing Christine, because of the likelihood of her being targeted, but I believe she will do the job well and provide a better representation to families than Cindy Kiro for example who publicly supported the anti-smacking bill and used the weight of her office to do so.

#6.1.1 - Paula Wagstaff 2009-06-30 00:54 - (Reply)

Oh don't I know it annonymous. The WHOLE weight of the office will try and destroy her. Actually it is good, as MANY have been shocked at their venomn, and it has revealed their true colours. We said phonics should not be removed and THEY ignored us, we said not to lower the drinking age,and they ignored us. The list is long, but they ALWAYS get their own way. We told them that if they remove the ability of a parent to smack, when a child is determined to defy and run amock, that these same children would be out-of-control and end up angry and violent. For YEARS 'they' told parents they couldn't smack way before the law was passed, as we have watched the children become far more violent even bashing their teachers etc etc

#7 - Elisapeci Samanunu Waqanivalu said:
2009-06-23 15:03 - (Reply)

Oh wow,thanks, we get to hear first hand news from the PrimeMinister himself. Its awesome & exciting to get a feel of the interactions The Hon. PM has with the 'everyday people'as per the Key Notes from the Hon PM himself. [All Blacks & France Rugby boys-not so everyday though, but meant others.] Just on a tiny note, is it really true that once someone enters Government, one become 'bureaucratized' & the concepts are two fold i.e a) Instrumentalize or Rationalize b) Subjective The only hope there are if two meet at a safe zone in the middle to find that 'optimum balance'? Just curious to know whether the theory is in fact true or not so. Tena Koto Tena Koto Tena Koto Katoa & Vinaka vakalevu.

#8 - Harvey Rosieur 2009-06-23 17:41 - (Reply)

In summing up the Sth. Island forum Mr Key says the fastest way to get thrown out is to forget the people who put him there. Why then , when an overwhelming majority of New Zealanders want the 'anti-smacking legislation' repealed, is he refusing to listen? Why also the push for a Super City in Auckland which is not really wanted? He is not really listening.

#9 - Heiko Müller-Cajar 2009-06-23 19:44 - (Reply)

Great to see that National is warming up NZ houses (and I mean that!). Pitty however that there seems to be little heat left for (against) the anti smacking legislation. This legislation has been introduced by a previous "politically correct" and "we know better than the people" government which stopped to listen to its voters. The Anti-smacking legislation penalises good and law abiding parents by moving basically every parent into a legal grey zone - dependant on the "discretion" of neighbours and police. I can't see however any evidence that the new rules reduced the child abuse rate in NZ; The courts are full of terrible (and already under previous legislation illegal) cases of child abuse. folks - people elected you because they thought (hoped) that you can bring some common sense into the debate. Please do so, take part in the discussion and listen to your voters and the outcome of the referendum!

#9.1 - John Casey 2009-07-05 13:31 - (Reply)

The 'legal grey zone' bothers me too.The law is, smacking is illegal, but we are advised that the police will decide on actioning a complaint on it's merits.Is'nt this "clayton'law,does'nt it demeen law and encourage contempt for law? And what about the malicious complaint, made as a payback for some slight, or just plain nastiness,which causes much distress,use of police resources,and a whole lot of wasted effort? Has "the deal' become your motivation Mr Key, to the extent that you will protect it even though it is wrong to do so?

#10 - Ron Melville 2009-06-25 06:26 - (Reply)

Smacking Referendum wasn't very impressed to hear John Key and Phil Goff would not be voting in the referendum, that reeked of elitism. John & Phil if you lived in Oz you may be obliged by law to vote ! John Key by statements made as opposition leader gave the impression he was against these "nanny state" provisions and now appears to walk away from this commitment.

#11 - Andrew Atkin said:
2009-06-25 10:15 - (Reply)

I think we should compliment the anti-smaking law with a new policy, as follows: If a parent or caregiver is caught seriously abusing their child (real physical abuse and/or sexual abuse) then they should have to accept home surveillance. That means a camera in every room except the parents bedroom, and outside the home in the persons property as well. The child should not be allowed in the parents bedroom. Extreme Big Brother intrusiveness? Yep, but it is still absolutely nothing copmared to the life crippling impact of serious child abuse on the child. I believe that parents who we know cannot be trusted should not be trusted.

#12 - John Chant 2009-06-25 11:17 - (Reply)

Re-the wharf development - scrap the century-old sheds and build a decent expo site, etc. Don't forget, however, that we are not all raving rugby fans and I am somewhat unmoved and cynical regarding the so-called financial benefits to the country. It appears that all the proceeds remain at the top and with the tourist industry. I am still looking for the cheque in the post for my slice of the benefits from the Americas' Cup. Perhaps we the people should get a divvy as well.

#13 - Jeannette Cavanagh 2009-06-28 17:31 - (Reply)

It was great to meet you at the Field Days and I re-iterate what I said - the we are thrilled to have you at the helm of our country in this economic climate. you are dong and amazing job and I hope you don't take to heart all the comments from detractors. We elected you and gave you the mandate to Govern because we had complete faith in your ability. So far, in my opinion, you have not let us down and are doing a fantastic job in a very difficult ecomomic climate. hyou won't forget the pigs will you. That situation should be rectified asap as they are suffering and it needs to be stopped.

#14 - Tom Hunsdale said:
2009-07-08 22:15 - (Reply)

Mr Key I think you are a great leader of this country and I look forward to the years ahead positively even though things are tough now. Regarding the referendum, please do not dismiss it out of hand as seems to be the case so far. This issue is about much more than the topic of the referendum, it is about the people of this country needing to know that politicians actually listen to the people who elected them. Don't get me wrong, people are angry about the anti smacking nonsense, but they are more upset that firstly Labour, and now apparently National will act against the known wishes of the majority. It is a test of whether or not politicians listen. There is much for National and yourself to lose if this goes wrong. Regards.


Add Comment

E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.